<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s All Get Inline (In a Block, In a Block)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Website Promotion and Blogging Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul OB</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-143851</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-143851</guid>
		<description>Hi Dinesh thanks for your comments.

Were you asking another question there or have I misunderstood :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dinesh thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>Were you asking another question there or have I misunderstood <img src='http://www.search-this.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinesh</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-143732</link>
		<dc:creator>dinesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-143732</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this clear and understanding inline-block. 

I need a good example using haslayout trigger.

for example 
zoom:1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this clear and understanding inline-block. </p>
<p>I need a good example using haslayout trigger.</p>
<p>for example<br />
zoom:1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul OB</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-143497</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-143497</guid>
		<description>@John, The demo does already have a full doctype (http://www.pmob.co.uk/search-this/inline-block-example2.htm).

I would always advise to use a full doctype anyway or all versions of IE revert to quirks mode and then all bets are off.:)

All my articles assume that valid code and full doctypes (with uri) are in effect.

Thanks for mentioning it anyway in case it wasn&#039;t clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John, The demo does already have a full doctype (<a href="http://www.pmob.co.uk/search-this/inline-block-example2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmob.co.uk/search-this/inline-block-example2.htm</a>).</p>
<p>I would always advise to use a full doctype anyway or all versions of IE revert to quirks mode and then all bets are off.:)</p>
<p>All my articles assume that valid code and full doctypes (with uri) are in effect.</p>
<p>Thanks for mentioning it anyway in case it wasn&#8217;t clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Middlemas</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-143457</link>
		<dc:creator>John Middlemas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-143457</guid>
		<description>If you are using IE8 with your code then you need to use a !DOCTYPE declaration. Without that it will not display correctly at all. Firefox does not have this problem and displays correctly in both quirks mode and standards mode.

If you don&#039;t want to have a !DOCTYPE declaration then altering your code to the following does the trick:-

&lt;!--[if IE]&gt;--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are using IE8 with your code then you need to use a !DOCTYPE declaration. Without that it will not display correctly at all. Firefox does not have this problem and displays correctly in both quirks mode and standards mode.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want to have a !DOCTYPE declaration then altering your code to the following does the trick:-</p>
<p><!--[if IE]&gt;--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul OB</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-134059</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-134059</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments, I have edited the article to take your comments into account :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, I have edited the article to take your comments into account <img src='http://www.search-this.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrightBold</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-134025</link>
		<dc:creator>BrightBold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-134025</guid>
		<description>This is a great article - you lay everything out very clearly. 

After the line: &quot;...we must specify it in a separate rule so we don&#039;t cancel out the display:inline effect,&quot; you should reverse the order of the two rules in the CSS example. That made me think the &quot;display:inline&quot; rule needed to come first, and I couldn&#039;t figure out why my code wasn&#039;t working until I read the comments and saw I had it reversed. 

(And yes, I know it&#039;s better to have that rule in the IE conditional stylesheet, but I didn&#039;t put it there because I thought that rule needed to load first!)

Thanks for this clear and thorough explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article &#8211; you lay everything out very clearly. </p>
<p>After the line: &#8220;&#8230;we must specify it in a separate rule so we don&#8217;t cancel out the display:inline effect,&#8221; you should reverse the order of the two rules in the CSS example. That made me think the &#8220;display:inline&#8221; rule needed to come first, and I couldn&#8217;t figure out why my code wasn&#8217;t working until I read the comments and saw I had it reversed. </p>
<p>(And yes, I know it&#8217;s better to have that rule in the IE conditional stylesheet, but I didn&#8217;t put it there because I thought that rule needed to load first!)</p>
<p>Thanks for this clear and thorough explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Articles You May Have Missed in 2008, But Shouldn&#8217;t Have</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-121583</link>
		<dc:creator>Articles You May Have Missed in 2008, But Shouldn&#8217;t Have</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-121583</guid>
		<description>[...] Let’s All Get Inline (In a Block, In a Block) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let’s All Get Inline (In a Block, In a Block) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kravvitz</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-109877</link>
		<dc:creator>Kravvitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-109877</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t aware that hasLayout had different triggers on inline and block level elements, but with a little testing in IE6 and IE7 with the IE Dev Toolbar, Paul seems to be right (as usual :) ).

Thanks for explaining this, Paul. I&#039;ll be sure to add a link to this page on each of the two demo pages on my site that demonstrate this technique.

By the way, I have a new blog on my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware that hasLayout had different triggers on inline and block level elements, but with a little testing in IE6 and IE7 with the IE Dev Toolbar, Paul seems to be right (as usual <img src='http://www.search-this.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
<p>Thanks for explaining this, Paul. I&#8217;ll be sure to add a link to this page on each of the two demo pages on my site that demonstrate this technique.</p>
<p>By the way, I have a new blog on my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: konteyner</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-92226</link>
		<dc:creator>konteyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-92226</guid>
		<description>i see why it should behave differently. to inline elements will make them behave like block-inline elemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see why it should behave differently. to inline elements will make them behave like block-inline elemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul OB</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-91929</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-91929</guid>
		<description>@dir _ What are you not sure about?

A haslayout trigger will only apply to the element if the element understands the property being applied.

For example &quot;height&quot; and width&quot; are haslayout triggers but for inline elements height and width don&#039;t apply so they will not trigger &quot;haslayout&quot; on inline elements.

Applying haslayout to a block elements will not make it behave like an inline-block. Applying haslayout to inline elements will make them behave like inline-block elements.

Therefore &quot;haslayout&quot; does affect inline and block elements in a different manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dir _ What are you not sure about?</p>
<p>A haslayout trigger will only apply to the element if the element understands the property being applied.</p>
<p>For example &#8220;height&#8221; and width&#8221; are haslayout triggers but for inline elements height and width don&#8217;t apply so they will not trigger &#8220;haslayout&#8221; on inline elements.</p>
<p>Applying haslayout to a block elements will not make it behave like an inline-block. Applying haslayout to inline elements will make them behave like inline-block elements.</p>
<p>Therefore &#8220;haslayout&#8221; does affect inline and block elements in a different manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dir</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-91327</link>
		<dc:creator>dir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-91327</guid>
		<description>that haslayout behaves differently on block vs inline elements (i am not sure about)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that haslayout behaves differently on block vs inline elements (i am not sure about)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kabin</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-90652</link>
		<dc:creator>kabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-90652</guid>
		<description>the conflict of using the same display property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the conflict of using the same display property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul OB</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-89058</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-89058</guid>
		<description>@John: The display:inline rule must follow the display:inline-block rule and must be in a separate rule or it doesn&#039;t work properly due to the conflict of using the same display property. Although it partially works in reverse the effect is not the same.

Setting display-inline and using zoom as a haslayout trigger is a much simpler method as all styles can remain in the same block because there are no conflicts between the properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: The display:inline rule must follow the display:inline-block rule and must be in a separate rule or it doesn&#8217;t work properly due to the conflict of using the same display property. Although it partially works in reverse the effect is not the same.</p>
<p>Setting display-inline and using zoom as a haslayout trigger is a much simpler method as all styles can remain in the same block because there are no conflicts between the properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golgotha</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-88862</link>
		<dc:creator>Golgotha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-88862</guid>
		<description>Thanks Paul, that clears things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul, that clears things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougwig</title>
		<link>http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/lets-all-get-inline-in-a-block-in-a-block/comment-page-1/#comment-88716</link>
		<dc:creator>dougwig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-this.com/?p=715#comment-88716</guid>
		<description>Nice!

I look forward to applying this technique to vertically center a string of inline elements ---images, spans, inputs, labels, etc within a &quot;line-box&quot;.

Would be nice to give the floats a rest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!</p>
<p>I look forward to applying this technique to vertically center a string of inline elements &#8212;images, spans, inputs, labels, etc within a &#8220;line-box&#8221;.</p>
<p>Would be nice to give the floats a rest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
